Section 1.2. Institutional and Digital Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship Development in the Digital Economy

Authors

Viacheslav Kokhno
Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5499-4415 (unauthenticated)

Keywords:

entrepreneurship infrastructure, digital economy, institutional infrastructure, digital infrastructure, entrepreneurial ecosystem, sustainable development

Synopsis

The development of entrepreneurship in the digital economy increasingly depends on the quality of institutional and digital infrastructure that enables coordination, innovation, and resilience under uncertainty. In countries undergoing structural transformation, infrastructure becomes not only a technical basis for business activity, but also an ecosystem mechanism that reduces transaction costs, expands access to resources, and supports sustainable entrepreneurial dynamics. This study aims to conceptualize entrepreneurship infrastructure through an ecosystem lens and to justify a model of “dual multilevelness” that integrates the internal functional architecture of infrastructure with the external ecosystem environment in which it operates. The research applies theoretical generalization, structural and functional analysis, and conceptual modeling to synthesize existing approaches to entrepreneurship support and to systematize infrastructure components across multiple levels. The findings position entrepreneurship infrastructure as an open, dynamic system in which institutional, financial, innovation and technological, informational and consulting, and logistics and production components interact. The proposed dual multilevel model links these internal functional subsystems to external natural, technogenic, socio-economic, and institutional value layers, making it possible to identify synergies, dependencies, and systemic risks. This framework strengthens the analytical basis for strategic planning of entrepreneurship development and for designing balanced policy instruments in the digital economy. The ecosystem interpretation and the dual multilevel model provide a coherent basis for diagnosing infrastructure gaps and improving coordination among actors and resources. Future studies should operationalize the model through measurable indicators, test it empirically across regions, and evaluate its usefulness for policy design and digital maturity assessments.

Author Biography

Viacheslav Kokhno, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design
Ph.D. Student, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv

References

Adhitya, S., Dolan, T., & Tyler, N. (2016). Rethinking “sustainable infrastructure”: Natural processes, context, value and balance. University College London.

Antoniuk, D. A. (2016). Modernizatsiia instytutsiinoi infrastruktury rehionalnoho pidpryiemnytstva v protsesi yevropeiskoi intehratsii Ukrainy [Modernization of the institutional infrastructure of regional entrepreneurship in the process of European integration of Ukraine] (Doctoral dissertation). State Institution “Institute of Regional Research named after M. I. Dolishnii of the NAS of Ukraine”, Lviv, Ukraine. https://ird.gov.ua/irdd/d20160617_a805_AntonyukDA.pdf

Bobrov, V. Ya. (1995). Osnovy rynkovoi ekonomiky [Fundamentals of market economy]. Lybid.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 7, 3-11.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Dziubyk, S., & Ryvak, O. (1994). Osnovy ekonomichnoi teorii [Fundamentals of economic theory]. Osnovy.

Hrytsenko, A., & Soboliev, V. (1998). Rynkova infrastruktura: Sutnist, funktsii, struktura [Market infrastructure: Essence, functions, structure]. Ekonomika Ukrainy [Economy of Ukraine], (4), 35-44.

Kagan, M. S. (1996). Systemnost i tselostnost [Consistency and integrity]. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], (12), 13-18.

Lykholat, S. M. (2001). Rynkova infrastruktura [Market infrastructure]. Visnyk Lvivskoi komertsiinoi akademii [Bulletin of the Lviv Commercial Academy], (9), 185-191.

Mocherny, S. V. (Ed.). (2000). Ekonomichna entsyklopediia [Economic encyclopedia] (Vol. 1). Vydavnychyi tsentr “Akademiia”.

Shtets, T. F. (2023). Digital economy as a factor of entrepreneurship development. Ekonomika i suspilstvo [Economy and Society], (27), 25-31.

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2020). What blockchain could mean for your health data. INSEAD Knowledge. https://www.insead.edu/faculty-research/publications/journal-articles/what-blockchain-could-mean-your-health-data

Ukraiinska, L. O., & Shifrina, N. I. (2023). Digital infrastructure of formation in the information society. Ekonomika ta derzhava [Economy and the State], (1), 109-111.

Varnalii, Z. S. (2015). Konkurentsiia i pidpryiemnytstvo [Competition and entrepreneurship]. Znannia Ukrainy.

Zatonatskyi, D. A. (2023). Institutional support for the formation of digital infrastructure in the context of European integration processes: A case for Ukraine. Finansy Ukrainy [Finance of Ukraine], (2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.02.071

Published

December 30, 2025